| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Htick & ancient tic processors |
BP> {at}CHRS: LATIN-1 2
BP> {at}CODEPAGE: 865
This is gross bullshit. How did you manage to get THIS kludge combination?
You are writing with Msged, obviously, but I'm almost sure that the Msged
that I wrote will never put there a Codepage kludge AND a LATIN-1 kludge.
The Codepage kludge does only make sense if you have a IBMPC kludge.
What could have caused this? Maybe you wrote the message with Msged
configured for IBMPC, then changed your config to LATIN-1 and reedited the
message? Maybe this could cause such a combination.
Or does anybody inbetween change kludge lines? How does this message of
yours look in your own message base?
Regards,
Tobias.
--- Msged/MAC 6.1.2
* Origin: We love MsgEd ... (2:2476/418.15)SEEN-BY: 10/3 345 102/943 106/1 2 3 1234 2000 123/500 128/187 130/803 140/1 SEEN-BY: 143/2 201/505 226/600 229/1000 2000 3000 249/116 267/200 280/5003 SEEN-BY: 333/0 379/1 1200 550/5012 633/267 270 2404/201 2624/306 3800/1 @PATH: 2476/418 140/1 106/2000 1 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.