-> ->  GD> The name one that you actually read.
-> -> 
-> -> The "Principles of Lasers" for one. Plus several
books on computers.
-> -> 
-> 
-> 
-> Those are engineering manuals, not science books. Now if it had been
-> something on the science of optics that led to the creation of LASERs,
that
-> would be a different thing altogether.

And would therefore come under your approval?
Are you (all) INSANE?

You (all) are going to judge the books of science others have read?
Wheee!
 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5