0n (13 Jun 08) Roy Witt wrote to Cindy Haglund...

 RW> 13 Jun 08 09:14, Cindy Haglund wrote to all:

 CH> Warning: this is not a rant. :) Not really!

 CH> Hi all. In Thursday's Nytimes and yes I know some of you are adverse
 CH> to that newspaper but remember things we dislike can have some use/
 CH> good to them.. it just depends on what parts you look into.

 RW> Yeup. Back in the old days, before garbage disposals, we wrapped
 RW> garbage in newspapers. The NYT was and still is the most appropriate
 RW> one to use.

  LOL. Newspapers are good for wrapping food and disposable diapers
in ..that cant go down the disposable.

Now Let me ask you something. If this SAME article which has no
bearing on the source- was in a newspaper of YOUR choice, would you
comment on the subject? Be honest. I understand the attitude. I doubt
i'd have read it if it were in a paper I didn't care for either.

There was another interesting article "Mystery on Faith Avenue" some of
you might find interesting. It has NOTHING To do with the source. It's
about a 1911 apt on Faith ave that was remodeled to look perfectly
normal.. but there are hidden puzzles...  It sounds fascinating. Great
for the family of four who moved in there. Now...

I think, I am willing to bet REAL money if this article were in a
paper you liked, you'd enjoy it.

Now come on. Admit it that sometimes we are all a bit unfairly biased.

Cindy

... Seize no evil, ears no evil, and nose no evil.

--- PPoint 3.01