-> -> church :-) --and As Ed Hulett is with his. May we all continue to
learn.
-> -> (Those who stop trying to learn, are of no further use to
Goddess...:-) )
-> 
-> 
-> What the hell has happened to you, John? You used to be rather coherent.

I gave coherency up for Lent.
-> 
-> The point of this is that it isn't anywhere close to logical to continue
to
-> believe a 'manuscript' when it is proven several times over that the
-> so-called translation wasn't a translation at all.
Why I wonder did it have to be proved over and over? I off handedly think
that it wasn't a translation it was an inspiration: Looking at hieroglyphs
in the British Museum, I was transfixed by it...imagining I could read it,
awed by it; the care taken, the ubiquity of it's message what ever it
was...I was hypnotized. Perhaps...I'm not sayin', but perhaps...anyway, it
depends on what it says. You want religion to be logical?
-> 
-> It's like thinking you have a copy of some lost work of Socrates and
-> finding out it was only a rendition of "The Cat in the
Hat", a laundry
list
-> and a recipe for barbecued camel.
It's like that for those who wish to believe that it's like that. I'm not
about to try to convince you that it's NOT like that, nor will your 'logic'
prevail with those who think otherwise. (Is! Is not! Is! Is not!)
->
Cheers...
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5