"JOHNJWILSON -> ROSS SAUER"  wrote in
news:7860$HOLYSMOKE{at}JamNNTPd:

 RS>>>> Ok, yes or no, none of your bullshit.

 RS>>>> Is the Book Of Mormon inerrant, or not?

 J>   Many liberal/progressive Christians believe that the Bible was
 J>   written by
 J> individuals in ancient times who were promoting their own evolving
 J> spiritual beliefs, but who were severely limited by their tribal
 J> culture and by their lack of scientific knowledge.  Many liberals
 J> believe that it is important to recognize that many biblical passages
 J> contain factual errors and that many do not reflect the will of God.
 J> They reject what the Bible's authors have to say on topics such as
 J> genocide, origins of species and of the universe, human slavery, the
 J> suppression and oppression of women, treatment of persons with a
 J> homosexual or bisexual orientation, religious intolerance, torturing
 J> prisoners, the death penalty, treatment of religious minorities,
 J> spanking children, executing non-virgin brides, and other laws and
 J> actions considered immoral by today's secular and religious
 J> standards.Inerrancy is no a 'yes no topic' There are four different
 J> ways to read (interpret) scripture. Inerrancy does not come into play
 J> in any of them.

Exactly, John.

While most of the people who wrote the Bible weren't stupid, but they
were ignorant.
They considered volcanos and earthquakes "signs from God," no, we know
that they are geologic occurences.

Back then, they didn't know that disease was caused by germs, now we do.

And so on...

Ed refuses to answer whether his holy book is factual or not, this shows
he is a fundy Mormon.

--- Xnews/5.04.25