13 Jun 08 17:51, Cindy Haglund wrote to Roy Witt:

 CH>> Warning: this is not a rant. :) Not really!

 CH>> Hi all. In Thursday's Nytimes and yes I know some of you are adverse
 CH>> to that newspaper but remember things we dislike can have some use/
 CH>> good to them.. it just depends on what parts you look into.

 RW>> Yeup. Back in the old days, before garbage disposals, we wrapped
 RW>> garbage in newspapers. The NYT was and still is the most appropriate
 RW>> one to use.

 CH>   LOL. Newspapers are good for wrapping food and disposable diapers
 CH> in ..that cant go down the disposable.

 CH> Now Let me ask you something. If this SAME article which has no
 CH> bearing on the source- was in a newspaper of YOUR choice, would you
 CH> comment on the subject?

Since all newspapers are liberal bent, I doubt that I would have a
favorite.

 CH> Be honest. I understand the attitude. I doubt i'd have read it if it
 CH> were in a paper I didn't care for either.

Without going into politics and the left leaning attitude of the NYT, I
can't comment further here.

                R\%/itt



--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000