Path: internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!news.atman.pl!news.intercom.pl!f124.n480!f127.n480!f112.n480!f200.n2432!f605.n774!f500.n123!f2000.n106!f3.n10!f1324.n202!f300.n202!f801.n202!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: fido.photo
Distribution: fido
From: "CLCOOK@OLYWA.NET"
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 03 20:24:40 +0100
Subject: Re: Things I've Learned
Message-ID:
Organization: Fanciful Online, San Diego, CA
111
Lines: 171
Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com fido.photo:483
Received: by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP Router v5.6.450.8)
for photo@fanciful.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 20:23:23 -0800
Received: from saf.tzo.com ([216.55.16.67]) HELO=saf.tzo.com
by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP v5.6.450.8) with SMTP
id 584510062; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 20:23:21 -0800
Received: from 216.174.194.62 by saf.tzo.com
id 2003121223224245355 for photo@fanciful.org;
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 04:22:42 GMT
Received: (qmail 28273 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2003 04:22:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Carl?Cook.olywa.net) (64.42.61.58)
by queue.atgi.net with SMTP; 13 Dec 2003 04:22:15 -0000
Message-Id:
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 20:24:39 -0800
To:
From: Carl Cook
Subject: Re: Things I've Learned
In-Reply-To:
I'm glad someone decided to comment on some of these. I recommend getting
the magazine for the full list. I'll just comment on a couple of your
comments and leave room for others --
> Cl> 4. No amount of darkroom work can make up for a badly exposed or
> Cl> composed negative. (This includes Photoshop work. ed)
>
> Dunno on that one Carl. New rule is expose for the highlights, let
> PhotoShop handle the shadows. Even with a scanned negative, you find
> things in there you can't handle in the darkroom.
>
My own comment here is that I think this statement applies equally to the
digital darkroom. Your final image will only be as good as what went into
the original. A piece of junk photo will still be garbage after all the
special effects and "correction' is applied. If it had nothing going in, it
won't have any coming out -- or as the old saying goes, "Garbage in,
garbage out." A good image starts "up here," not in the camera or in the
computer.
> The most important thing one can get from a workshop is additional
> friends with whom to discuss your common interest.
I agree here. Last night, the local newspaper sponsored their first Photo
Night. As one of their shooters is the NPPA regional director, he invited
the new Photographer of the Year from the region (Oregon, Washington,
Alaska, British Columbia) who dazzled us, and I do mean dazzled with his
slide presentation. An AP photographer from Seattle brought the latest
award winners from their competition, and a couple of former interns showed
their latest work. Invited guests included not only editorial shooters, but
a couple of commercial photographers and some members of the local camera
club. In other words it was open to all. What a great night it was.
Everyone came out feeling good about what they heard and saw -- and felt
most definitely inspired by the Photographer of the Year winner, whom I can
truly say will go on my list as one of those rare moments in my life (we
all have hopefully a few) when I had a chance to meet and talk at length
with someone who is truly great at what they do -- one of the monsters).
Look him up, Drew Perine from the Tacoma News Tribune. They are hoping this
gathering becomes a monthly event to take place at a newspaper or other
suitable location somewhere here in the Northwest.
> Cl> 9. The process of photography is more important then the product.
>
> I disagree on this one. The process being the mechanics of creating
> an image for viewing by others. Those folks who are wrapped up in the
> process are the other end of the scale from the camera collector folks.
> The folks who love the process are more than likely the same ones who
> will spend hours adjusting their lawnmowers to idle at the slowest
> possible speed, instead of just cutting the grass. For them the process
> is the product. To most though, the product of the process is the photo
> to be seen and hopefully enjoyed by others. To proudly say, look at the
> great tonal range and fine grain I achieved with Pan-X shot at a ten
> percent greater than rated ASA then developed in Microdol at a ten
> degrees warmer temperature, when the picture itself has all the
> interest of a taco burp, is missing the basic reason for photography.
I'll disagree here. I like the statement. To put it simply, If the process
isn't more important, then the product won't be very good. Not talking
about the nitpickers you mention above. Often their product doesn't equal
their effort because process is why they are in the game. Has nothing to do
with the statement -- just as collecting cameras (and not using them) has
nothing to do with photography.
The statement can also be analogous to taking a road trip. The folks who
will get the most out of the trip, who will become enriched by it, will
carry the trip with them for the rest of their lives are the ones who
travel for the journey and only worry about the destination when they get
there.
> Cl> 11. If your work looks like someone else's, ask yourself why and don't
> Cl> answer right away. Think about this deeply. If you do, your work will
> Cl> become better almost immediately.
>
> Or even more like the person's who you are emulating. To copy another
> is the sincerest form of flattery.
It also shows a lack of imagination, and originality. -- unfortunately the
condition of far, far too many picture takers. For me, the greatest form
of flattery would be if someone were to tell me they felt inspired to go
out and do their own thing -- and to get really good at it. But like it
says, think about it deeply.
Remember, a mediocre teacher merely shows fact,figures and technique, a
great teacher inspires one to find their own answers.
> Cl> 12. It is easy to make a picture of someone and call it a portrait.
> Cl> The difficulty lies in making a picture that makes the viewer care
> Cl> about a stranger. (Paul Strand)
>
> True, but then we are more often called upon to produce a picture of
> someone than we are to produce a portrait. To me a portrait is a
> picture that speaks something about the personality of the person
> pictured. Something that is worthy of a 16 x 20 properly matted and
> mounted in a heavy 20 x 24 frame.
>
> Maybe we might start trying to make more portraits when the new
> Epson 4000 printer at $1795 is available after the first of the year.
> Printing 16 x 20 on the many different papers including real canvas,
> with a 80 to 100 year lifetime is enough for me to change. Inkjet
> printing with greater permanence than Cibichrome or even dye transfer.
> Eight colors in 110 or 220 ml individual tanks for 70 (110ml) or 130
> (220ml) bucks each is a great price for refills. If your metric is a
> bit sloppy that's around 7 1/2 ounces or close to a half pint of ink at
> 220ml. Looks like something in this room will have to go to make space
> for a 3 x 5 foot printer.
But that big fancy schamncy printer won't make a "picture" into a
"portrait." :)
> Cl> 14. The scarier it is to make a photograph, the more likely to are to
> Cl> learn.
>
> I'm afraid that one goes right over my head. Expand on it for me will
> you?
Like everything else in life, if we confront our fears, we are better for
it. For many photographers, the mere idea of going up to a stranger and
asking it they can take a picture is like -- well, they would rather put
their hand in a jar of black widow spiders, yet photojournalists, for
example, do this on a daily basis. Many of them will tell you they had the
same fear, and some still do. They have to tell themselves, OK, just go
and, as Nike says, "Do it!"
Later, you feel much better, you've gotten the shot you wanted, maybe made
a friend, and you will have -- yes, learned a whole lot. For myself, the
years in broadcasting with countless on location remotes where you have to
stop strangers for interviews was a terrific way to overcome the fear.
Today, I can walk up to just about anyone and take their picture (or ask
first depending on the situation), or just chew the fat with them. As easy
as it seems, I still often have to stop first and think about it for a
second -- but I know (and have had to) if need be just jump in and do
whatever needs to be done.
Inviting more to comment as I just sit back and watch -- :) And learn.
Carl
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: clcook@olywa.net
http://www.clcookphoto.com
|