Re: SBBS/W32 Kermit SABOTAGE
  By: Paul Westell to Rob Swindell on Wed Oct 13 2004 05:06 am

 > Oct 12 22:34 04, Rob Swindell wrote to Maurice Kinal:
 > 
 >  RS> {at}TZUTC: -0800
 >  RS> {at}MSGID: 1:103/705 05d205a2 4421.linux_bb 05D205A2
 >  RS> {at}REPLY: 1:153/401.1 416c1ccd
 >  RS> {at}PID: Synchronet 3.11c-Win32 beta Debug Sep 11 2004 MSC 1200
 >  RS> {at}TID: SBBSecho 2.10-Win32 r1.155 Sep 16 2004 MSC 1200
 >  RS>   Re: SBBS/W32 Kermit SABOTAGE
 >  RS>   By: Maurice Kinal to Rob Swindell on Tue Oct 12 2004 07:05 pm
 > 
 >  > ...
 > 
 >  RS> My response was a legitimate "Huh?" too. I don't
understand most of wha
 > Michel writes and only sometimes actually ask for clarification (which never
 >  RS> seems to come anyway).
 > 
 > Perhaps you could clarify something for me. Why do your message ids have fou
 > fields when it is supposed to have only two?

Not sure what this has to do with Kermit, but the 3rd "field" is a just an
additional, truely unique value, creating a truely unique message-ID,
making-up for the diffiencies of FTS-9. The 4th "field" is just a repeat of
the 32-bit "serialno", just incase some software somewhere parses out the
serialno (from right to left).

                                                  digital man

Snapple "Real Fact" #91:
There are more telephones then people in Washington D.C.
--- SBBSecho 2.10-Win32