JOHNJWILSON -> ED HULETT wrote:

 RS>>>>> Is the Book Of Mormon inerrant, or not?

 EH>>>> I don't have to answer your silly question.
 J> I tried to begin a start of one in my post to him.

 J> I just realized; there might be my --what?-- appreciation of Mormons (other
 J> than pleasant relations with those I've known...due to the fact that I am a
 J> Freemason...but haven't been active in years...and I wondered if many
 J> Mormons were...looked it up...no stats but for the first time this year an
 J> LDS member was made The Grand Master of a lodge, in I don't remember
 J> where...

LDS members are not encouraged to join the Freemasons, nor is there any
connection between Freemasonry and the LDS Church.

Many LDS may well be Freemasons, but that is their own choice.

 J>  Regardless of what I say
 EH>>>> you
 EH>>>>   will use that in an attempt to attack me.
 J> I pondered this also in my post. As you may have noticed I'm into
 J> comparative religions...'with malice toward none' :-)...in the last few
 J> decades decades the philosophical implications of religion vis-a-vis
 J> Quantum mechanics...I've got a LOT of studying to do...:-)And in so many
 J> ways delightfully over my head.

You might have noticed that this echo is not where such discussion is
welcome. Anytime some believer enters the echo, the "atheists"
pounce. There is no debate here, just attack.

Ed

-- 
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of
his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who,
or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to
violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee
to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired
by it." --Thomas Jefferson

Linux User# 416016
Linux Machine# 385029

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318)