->  RS>> Is the Book Of Mormon inerrant, or not?
->  
->  EH>> I don't have to answer your silly question. Regardless of what I
say
->  EH>> you  will use that in an attempt to attack me. You aren't a smart
->  EH>> person.
->  
->  GD> You are a coward, Ed.

No, you are a would-be bully.

Does everything spiritual (Art. music) receive your equal scorn?
-> 
->  EH> More personal insult.
-> 
-> It's not an insult, Ed.

You think calling someone a coward other than an insult. Interesting. 

  It's the truth.

It's a despicable charge.

  Prove me wrong in this instance

You would never allow proof that you are wrong. You do not have an open
mind, merely an inchoate assembly of ill-founded convictions.
IMO, of course.
 
-> by answeromg Ross' question at the top.
You have failed in this packet to respond to questions; merely insult. Why
would someone try to convince you of anything?
 
->  
->  GD> You probably actually know your book is a bunch of bullshit.  You
just
->  GD> can't face the facts.
You are probably a fervent believer knowing that all holy books are full of
things that should be learned but just can't take the trouble.  


 
-> 
-> Either answer the question about your holy book or be the coward you
are.
Either stop making infantile alternatives or remain the harassing jerk you
seem to be trying to be.

  It 
-> shouldn't be hard to do.  After all, that book is sacred to you.  Or, is
it? 
All holy books contain whispered  truth from God, inaccurately heard (
impossible for human ears) , repeated 'till eventually written down. It's
inerrency depends on how deeply you plumb.  
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5