-=> Quoting John Perz to Dan Arico <=-
 JP> Try to remove Clinton from the White House by voting for Bob Dole.
 JP> Unfortunately, I see no realistic third option that will accomplish
 JP> both of these worthwhile ends.  It's an either/or scenario.
 JP> I concede that EITHER of these options is a defensible choice for a
 JP> pro-2nd voter to make.
There is _no_ defense for voting anti-gun.
 JP> For myself, I **CANNOT** cast a vote that I **KNOW** in my heart will
 JP> help re-elect Clinton.  That leaves me no choice but to vote for Dole.
 JP> I would now like to publicly THANK the Democrats for making their
 JP> intentions clear at their convention in Chicago.  I'm sure it's going
 JP> to drive a lot of gunowners back to Dole!
 
I should think so . . . . that's exactly what it was desinged to do,
frighten you into voting anti-gun.  Dole stands for the same Fascist
rhetoric, & worse.  The _only_ difference between them is that Brady 
Bill-Bob Dole lies out of the right side of him mouth, while Klinton . . .
. . . the left side.  Both are extreme hard-left.  They represent a one-
party system.
 -> candidate and I don't really care whether you do or not. *You're* the
 -> one who has to be comfortable with voting for Dole. If you're not,
 -> maybe you need to think this through again. If you are, that's fine.
 -> Vote for him.
 JP> And **You're** the one who has to be comfortable with a vote that will
 JP> help send Clinton back for four more years.  If you're not, maybe
 JP> **YOU** need to think this through again.  If you are, then go ahead
 JP> and vote for Browne.
 
 -> Dole's still a schmuck.
 JP> Yes he is.
Vote for either Dole/Klinton, & pretty soon you will find yourself out in
the woods with your SKS . . . . .  You _get_ what you vote for.
--- Blue Wave/386 v2.30 [NR]
---------------