SA> Mulling over George Pope to Steve Asher 20 Jul 2006
SA> 
SA>  GP> On (19 Jul 06) Steve Asher wrote to George Pope...
SA>  SA> Mulling over George Pope to Steve Asher 18 Jul 2006
SA>  SA>
SA>  SA>  GP> Posting this in this echo implies you don't believe
there can be
SA>  SA>  GP> ANY benign or positive application of this technology. . .
SA>  SA>
SA>  SA>  GP> Is that so?
SA>  SA>
SA>  SA> You are free to infer whatever you wish from any post in this echo (or
SA>  SA> any other echo, or source).
SA> 
SA>  GP> I prefer to hear the actual facts from the person himself, not
SA>  GP> infer anything that would have too muh chance of being in error (as
SA>  GP> I don't have the benefit of hearing YOUR view on it!)
SA> 
SA> Read your opening sentence ... you have inferred that I don't believe
SA> there can be ANY benign or positive application (etc). I have no idea
SA> why you would infer that (or why "this" [my post] implies that which
SA> you have inferred), but you are free to do so.

Read what I had said -- by posting in this echo such material, you're implying
that you deem it to be on the topic of "conspiracy". . . this
concept(conspiracy) is not one that lends itself to positive inferences.

Because I care,
|<+]::-{)}  (Cyberpope(the Bishop of ROM!))

... nfx v3.1 
--- Fringe BBS