On Mon, 05 Feb 2001 06:14:23 GMT, (Mad Hatter�) put forth the notion 
that:

> On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 21:15:28 -0800, Checkmate 
> wrote:
> 
> >> >Any talentless loozer (IE: You) can make bullshit claims about things 
> >> >they didn't do, then fail to back them up because, of course... you 
> >> >can't.  
> 
> >> http://208.56.95.192/fade/napster/
> >>
> >> I sure love making you look stupid, Stupid.  `, )
> 
> >I sure love trolling you into doing stoopid stuff for me.  
> 
> Sure Checky, it was all apart of yer up3r sekr@t plan to make yourself
> look like a blundering idiot.  You know it's not a troll unless you're
> right, otherwise you're just a sour grape with no other means of
> defense.

As a matter of fact, yes... I did plan to make you go scampering off 
for something to salvage your wounded ego, and very predictably, you 
obliged.  See how that works?  Of course you don't, you're an idiot...


 
> >BTW... did 
> >you happen to notice that YOUR way (#3) is virtually identical to (#2) 
> >that you copied it from, adding a little extra verbiage in the 
> >process?
> 
> Maybe that has something to do with the fact that there's only one way
> to fix the problem and I found that way on my own.  

Wrong.  There were three ways listed.  Yours (the last, 
chronologically), was simply a more verbose rehash of the one 
preceding it.  You offered nothing new, you simply parroted what the 
guy before you had said, then tried to take credit for it.


> It doesn't exactly
> take a rocket scientist to install Napster and track registry changes,
> nimrod.  

No shit.  I don't think anyone's ever accused you of being a rocket 
scientist, either.


> As it says on that d00ds site, mine is the best and the most
> thorough, not only that but I was the only one who offered extra
> assistance through e-mail.  

Wow... isn't THAT special?


> In other words Stupid, I supplied their
> community with something they didn't have and got respect for it...not
> that you would know what that's like you pathetic ass cake.

What did you supply them that they didn't already have, other than a 
lengthier explanation of what the guy who wrote method # 2 had already 
provided?  You may be able to dazzle a few people with your bullshit, 
but you can't snow the snowman, you no-talent wannabe hack.


 
> >> >Besides, you freely admit that you're a fucking liar, so why 
> >> >would anybody believe you now?   
>  
> >> But if I always lied then wouldn't I be lying about always lying,
> >> Stupid?
> 
> No thoughts on that, Stupid?

Just that you sound like an idiot as usual... no need for me to point 
out the obvious...

 
> -Mad Hatter
> 

-- 
Checkmate   
mhm 29x6
KotAGoR XXXIV
Copyright 2001
all rights reserved

alt.fan.checkmate
checkmate@MYPANTSkotagor.com
(remove my pants to reply)