Hi Earl,

On 2016-06-15 16:38:46, you wrote to me:

 EC> Doesn't look that way. Hypothetically, if someone wanted to create an
 EC> actual, functioning echo in which to have open discussions over the
 EC> value of the listing process, I would guess that would probably fly.
 EC> The same thing happened in another instance where it was determined
 EC> that "The echo is a legitimate one in use by private users."

 EC> But if someone wanted to have an actual, functioning echo, they
 EC> probably wouldn't claim that it originated from "the twilight
zone." A
 EC> list keeper could easily feel that it constituted a waste of time and
 EC> an abuse of the process. Now, if that same person were to log into a
 EC> BBS in another zone, submit the identical request to the echolist
 EC> right down to the "twilight zone" reference, and get it
ACCEPTED, then
 EC> you would have some solid basis to claim a zone bias.

Yes please put the focus on the specific contents of my echolisting,
instead of the real issue: The listing by Roy, and the actions of the
keeper in response to them. Both listings were meant to annoy, the keeper
removed 1, and didn't remove the other, it's really simple...

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-W32 1.69.22.178-B20160331