-> JP> I've basicly come to the conclusion that Guy, and maybe one or tw
-> JP> others here, are card-carrying Libertarian Party activists who ar
-> JP> out to "Get Votes For Harry" no matter what.
-> I hope you're not trying to describe me in that statement. I've been
-> trying to pursue this in a reasonable manner.
Yes you have.  It's only the ones who have been castigating anyone who
want's to keep Clinton from being re-elected who have been unreasonable.
I am certainly not saying that EVERYONE in this echo who is urging a
vote for Browne is a Libertarian Party activist.
Right now, a pro-2nd voter has two options:
Send a message to the Republicans that you won't stand for being screwed
over and taken for granted by voting for Harry Browne.
OR
Try to remove Clinton from the White House by voting for Bob Dole.
Unfortunately, I see no realistic third option that will accomplish both
of these worthwhile ends.  It's an either/or scenario.
I concede that EITHER of these options is a defensible choice for a
pro-2nd voter to make.
For myself, I **CANNOT** cast a vote that I **KNOW** in my heart will
help re-elect Clinton.  That leaves me no choice but to vote for Dole.
I would now like to publicly THANK the Democrats for making their
intentions clear at their convention in Chicago.  I'm sure it's going to
drive a lot of gunowners back to Dole!
-> candidate and I don't really care whether you do or not. *You're* the
-> one who has to be comfortable with voting for Dole. If you're not,
-> maybe you need to think this through again. If you are, that's fine.
-> Vote for him.
And **You're** the one who has to be comfortable with a vote that will
help send Clinton back for four more years.  If you're not, maybe
**YOU** need to think this through again.  If you are, then go ahead and
vote for Browne.
-> Dole's still a schmuck.
Yes he is.
Regards
John
--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12 
---------------