On Aug 25 01:15, 1996, Paul Edwards of 3:711/934.9 wrote:

PE> No, I consider it to be technically incorrect.  You've got the address up 
PE> the top, and you've even got the system name up the top.  If you want to do

I respectfully ask that you reconsider this position. It's nice to have the
node information up at the top but that only seems to work with the full
nodelist. If you're a point or have compiled only part of the nodelist, the
only thing that appears is the address.

I don't get much from the SEEN-BY lines but the origin lines are often
cute. There have been complaints in this zone that the "thought
police" censor what you can say in your nodelist entry but origin
lines are pretty wide open as long as they're not blatently obscene.

I've adjusted the indent in the last couple of sections of MSGED.DOC so
that there's room to punch it for insertion in a ring binder. I'll be doing
that for the README file also as soon as I get the chance. Is there any
chance that future copies will come out formatted this way? If you would
like I can send you the changes I've made.

The README file refers to a Zone 3 node for patches. Are there nodes in
other locations (or on the Internet) where these can be picked up? Right
now I'm still just reading the code and haven't tried to make any changes
myself.

My wife and I were very happy to see that there's a Windows 95 version
coming out soon. I've been poking around the Internet sites every couple of
days looking for this new version.

Steve
@EOT:

--- Msged/386 4.00