RW>GP> Again, you are just making this up.  Dole's anti-gun voting
RW>GP> record is just as bad as Klinton's or Metzenbaum's.
RW>Really?  When was the last time Dole introduced a bill
RW>to ban the private ownership of handguns?  Or the last
RW>time he tried to raise the tax on ammo by 1000%?
DA> Your reasoning fits exactly into the trap that Guy is
DA> pointing out. Your "excuse" for supporting Dole is that he
DA> is "LESS" anti-gun than the democrats.
That and the fact that he is the ONLY ONE running that
has a snowball's chance in SW Asia. 
DA> This is Guy's point.  In order to get gun-owners to vote
DA> anti-gun, "they" put Dole up against someone who is
DA> EXTREMELY anti-gun, and made it an "either/or" situation. 
DA> They make us WANT to vote for an anti-gunner like Dole,
DA> because the
Look at it this way, all the anti gunners are going to
vote for Clinton.  If the pro gunners, or less anti
gun, voters split their votes between two or three
people then who's going to win?  The "EXTREMELY anti-
gun" guy.
DA> Don't ask me who "they" are.  I'm still trying to figure
DA> that out.  But I think "they" are the behind-the-scenes
DA> puppet-masters who put Clinton in a position to be elected
DA> in the first place.  "They" are not the political parties.
I'm sorry but I don't see a giant conspiracy of "they".
If there were such a thing then other countries would
already be under "their" control.
If you can't tell me who "they" are then can you at
least tell me what "they" want?
                      Remember:  Freedom isn't Free!
--- timEd-B11
---------------