JP> I've basicly come to the conclusion that Guy, and maybe one or two
JP> others here, are card-carrying Libertarian Party activists who are
JP> out to "Get Votes For Harry" no matter what.
JP> If my suspicions are true, the incredibly inept and hostile way they
JP> are going about it also explains why the Libertarian Party hasn't
JP> been able to get more than 300,000 votes the last several
JP> presidential elections.
I hope you're not trying to describe me in that statement. I've been 
trying to pursue this in a reasonable manner.
For that matter, Guy isn't really that far off the mark except for his 
obvious assumption that nobody could vote for Dole except for evil 
reasons. Honest people can come to opposite conclusions about the course 
of action that we should take.
I don't think anybody here has tried to claim that Dole is a *good* 
choice - just that his election would be less damaging that Clinton's. 
I'm not so sure that is the case, but I consider it irrelevant. I'm 
voting for the best candidate. I'm voting because he is the best 
candidate and I don't really care whether you do or not. *You're* the 
one who has to be comfortable with voting for Dole. If you're not, maybe 
you need to think this through again. If you are, that's fine. Vote for 
him.
Dole's still a schmuck.
___
 X RM 1.3 02881 X P-Porky P-Pig of Borg: You will be assim-assim...absorbed
--- Maximus/2 2.02
---------------