-> MIKE FARRILL wrote in a message to DAVID BOWERMAN:
->
-> -> However, we now have to allow for the overhead which the
-> calculation -> (using a 128 byte packet) becomes:
-> -> 33600/8 * 128/135 * 60/61 or 3617CPS.
->
-> MF> Interesting, but I think that people get atleast or over 3617cps
-> MF> 31200bps.
->
-> You did notice that I was doing the calculation for 33600bps?
Yes I did, but I was stating that people get higher CPS rates than that
even at 31200.
--- Platinum Xpress/386/Wildcat! v1.3
---------------