Hi Willfred,

Drop this discussion.  If you need to discuss this, use netmail.

> On 2016-06-24 07:32:52, Flavio Bessa wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:
> about: "What happened to Zones 5 and 6?":

>>> How about a zone with maybe 4 active nodes?

>> It does make sense in my opinion, when these nodes are geographically
>> close and share content in common that's not echoed to the other
>> regions, for instance.

> I think it's totally redicioulus. ;)

>> Zone 4 has more or less 6 active nodes, but has been experiencing
>> growth, with many Sysops reactivating their systems.

> I could only connect to 4 with binkd. There are 3 systems which hostnames
> doesn't even resolve. For instance the Region 88 node. I think they should be
> removed from the list!

>> 4 is better than 1, in my opinion :)

> But still too little to form a zone!

Thank you for stopping this Wilfred.

Janis
Moderator

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-2