From: "Geo." 

"Robert Comer"  wrote in
message news:fcps13tb0493oa9cedsm1apolfrbq4dosk{at}4ax.com...

> But both my be right (or wrong).

random suggestions may be right or wrong as well, would you give them the
same weight as something that has at least partial proof?

> This discussion about possible FTL travel is not pure science yet,
> it's just belief (for or against)

There are two kinds of proof, positive proof and negative proof.  A lack of
natural phenomenon could be considered at least a partial negative proof.

> of time. Precognition is the main reason why I think that,

Precognition would not be possible unless the future is already set.. 

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5