From: "John Beamish" 

OK, it's not "somewhat farfetched", it so farfetched that it's
out of the world. ;-)  Thanks for setting me straight.

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 14:29:09 -0400, Rich Gauszka
 wrote:

>
>
> "John Beamish"  wrote in message
> news:op.tqi3t7t8m6tn4t{at}dellblack.phub.net.cable.rogers.com...
>> OK, it's somewhat far fetched, but he develops his argument in an almost
>> relentless, step-by-step approach.  (And, yes, it's true:  if one step
>> fails then all subsequent steps are meaningless -- but, still ...)
>>
>> http://www.enterprisemission.com//NukingJupiter.html
>
> http://forums.randi.org/archive/index.php/t-61191.html
>
> The supposed nuke cloud is nothing of the sort. This is nothing more
> than a
> festoon, which are common on Jupiter. Amateur astronomers are constantly
> monitoring Jupiter and the other planets. Jupiter is probably the
> easiest to
> image with webcams. Hoaxland used a blurry one but if you look here
>
> http://homepage3.nifty.com/~kuniaki/oaa/oaa-0310e.htm
>
> You will see an October 15th image (4 days before the blurry one shown on
> Hoaxland's site) of the same region, which is much higher quality. The
> same
> festoon is clearly visible.
>
> ------------
>
> Also even before Galileo crashed into Jupiter alarmists were speading the
> word that the crash would turn it into a second sun
>
> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/jupiter_galileo.html
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5