From: Robert Comer 

That's what I said, wasn't it?  It's what I meant anyway.


--
Bob Comer


On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:22:24 +0100, Ad
 wrote:

>Robert Comer wrote:
>> Nope, those are actually positive proof.  Negative proof is proof by
>> the absence of proof, and is invalid.
>>
>
>the absence of proof is not proof of absence.
>
>
>Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5