THC>Concerning _Skeptic's corner._, RON TAYLOR said to FRED AUSTIN in UFO:
THC> FA>> Every heard of statistical probabilities....
   > RT>
   > RT> If we are to use statistical probabilities we must admit that out of 
t
   > RT> literally millions of UFO sightings, thousands of encounters of 
variou
   > RT> kinds, and alien visitations over the eons that have been reported, 
at
   > RT> least ONE piece of tangible alien evidence would have been found,
   > RT> preserved and made public.  No government is big enough, smart 
enough,
   > RT> and quick enough to suppress it all that well this long.
THC>You're assuming that if tangible alien evidence was found, preserved, and 
m
   >public, it would be accepted as such.
Yes, I suppose so.  But then I would have to consider ANY evidence,
wouldn't I.  What tangible evidence, certified alien or otherwise,
is available to substantiate a UFO event?  There is lots of talk about
I-beams, little grey people, implants, radioactive/magnetic fields,
etc... but where are they.  They always seem to belong to someone
else (a fellow I know?)... have been lost... mysteriously disappeared...
were taken by strangers (this one REALLY blows my mind)... but no one
has anything to even be tested, much less tested positive alien.
   >  What is it about the proverbial "alien
   >ashtray" that makes it identifiably alien, beyond any possibility of hoax 
o
   >error?  Any type of alloy, isotope ratio, functioning electronics, etc 
that
   >can run tests on, we can also create in the first place.
I'm not a scientist, but my understanding is that isotope ratio testing
is a reliable way to ascertain origin. How 'bout it George???
---
 þ QMPro 1.02 42-7029 þ Your E-Mail has been returned due to insufficient 
volta
e
---------------