AV> JK> I do have some papers and books around here on this subject,
AV>I have seen the evidence regarding your purported plethora of
AV>authorities -- it is as substantial as Joe McCarthy's list of
AV>names of communists.  If you spent as much time typing up what you
AV>claim to have as you have spent typing your proclamations regarding
AV>its existence, you would by now have it available to upload for
AV>others to review by a simple import command.
I'm not responsible for your lack of knowledge on subjects I've spent
50 years accumulating.  I was 19 when I began as a student nurse in a
federal psych hospital in D.C. There were diagnoses there which just
aren't available today, at least to the average student nurse.
I learned to give bed baths and basic care on folks with tertiary
syhphilis in the late stage, after it had hit the brain.  There was an
entire building filled with neurological patients the likes of which I
have not seen since.
And I have sat and listened to more addicts in recovery than you will
ever get a chance to meet.
AV> JK> That also will not impact a true marijuana addict.
AV>If such a person exists, he/she is a truly rare bird.  Anyone
AV>who claims to be a marijuana addict is most likely a person
AV>with a victim mentality who relies upon the claim of addiction
AV>to justify his or her continued use in the face of peer
AV>disapproval.
I suggest you go find a copy of the DSM IV, the official manual of
mental illnesses in this nation, and find out what it says in it about
marijuana.  That is, if you want the truth instead of whatever your
peers tell you is so.
 
* SLMR 2.1a * I think therefore I am not a REpublican. 
- JetMail v1.20*6 - Unregistered QWK Mail Door for Spitfire
--- FreeMail 1.10 alpha-3
---------------