Hello Oli and others,

Mon. 11 Nov 2019, 12:33:09, Oli wrote to Paul Quinn:

DD>>> What common tech specs will they use?
Ol>> The ones people agree to. I mean we already have a tech specs.

PQ> Who keeps them maintained in a central library?  Why should anyone
PQ> agree to any?

O> Because! Without any agreement, no communication. I'm also not sure how
O> coordinators are responsible for any standardization (apart from Ward
O> inventing useless nodelist flags that are not part of any central
O> specification library)?

You mean his ,MOB flag.
Indeed, there is no phonenumber, no IPv4 address and no IPv6 address,
i.e. most ,MOB systems are unconnectable.
The use of the ,MOB flag is a political deciscion, not a technical one.
It is of nu real usefull use.

Besides that, as a ZC he is filtering FTSC documented valid flags away,
but still leaves useless redundancy flags still in place,
both with his ERRORFLAGS programme he uses, that's also arbitrary.
I have proven that more than once. Search for old messages from me.

O> One of the essential specifications is still hiding between completely
O> irrelevant proposals.

And that specificatien is?

I am looking forard to your answer.

Henri.

--- WimpLink 1.05p