Hello Nick,

 GK>> So I ask you for the third time: what is your scientific qualification?

 NA> Qualified enough to spot your inherent comprehension problem. You can have
 NA> a degree in something but that does not necessarily mean you know
everything
 NA> on the subject. That is an authoritarian response to assume that a degree
 NA> proves absolute knowledge or even qualification.

 NA> Just like its an authoritarian response to hide behind religion and bible
 NA> quotes when asked about gay marriage or abortion. The person doesn't give
a
 NA> logical answer, just one that aligns with their belief that God is
absolute.

 NA> I have met people and have extended family-connection with those who are
 NA> extremely high functioning with university degrees and "qualification" in
 NA> your
 NA> view, but they cannot parallel-park their car or spot a Microsoft scam or
 NA> cook a meal to feed themselves if their life depended on it. They can
score
 NA> high on IQ testing but can fuck up a simple cup of coffee.

 NA> You assume that I must believe and recognize your definition of authority
or
 NA> qualification. That I must believe that a scientist can never be paid by
 NA> corporations or persuaded by politicians to do studies biased in their
 NA> favour. To believe without question that climate science is never wrong?

 NA> I then asked for your scientific qualification. You said, "Doesn't
matter".

 NA> Thats why you're being rediculed. I'm consistant with what I believe in,
 NA> you're busy moving the football goal-posts to wherever your belief takes
 NA> you.

"What is your scientific qualification?"

By your answer, as stated above, you are a nihilist.

Oh, how I love to keep it simple.  :)

--Lee

-- 
Pork. The One You Love.

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb