-> ->  C>>>  From what you've said, the LDS has given up
their 'garments'
-> ->  C> presented at
-> ->  C>>> the temple?
-> -> 
-> ->  ->> You obviously don't know how to read. I said no such thing nor
did I
-> ->  C> even imply
-> ->  ->> such a thing.
-> -> 
-> ->  C> Ed...see the QUESTION MARK at the end of that sentence? I was
ASKING.
-> -> 
-> -> What would make you ask such a question other than your
misunderstanding of
-> -> what I wrote?
-> 
-> 
-> I asked the question because you are so adamant that you don't wear the
-> underware...
I don't believe he ever said that.


 Whether you call them garments or melvin, the fact is that they
-> ARE long underware with special symbols on them and are presented in a
-> ceremony at temple.
Better than a Nun's apparel...what's the problem?

 (Now you've even admitted that some of your sect DO
-> consider them magical)

He never said that, either.



 When you kept insisting that such things don't
-> exist...

Wow. I don't recall that either. Now I don't read ALL the posts...


, I asked if the 'garments' are no longer used.

Of course they are still used. They are reminders. MY undergarments are
also sometimes reminders...not however of religious things...
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5