Hi Tommi,

On 2022-12-31 11:05:32, you wrote to me:

 TK> @MSGID: 2:221/6.600 63affb9c
 TK> @TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
 TK> @TZUTC: 0200
 TK> @CHRS: UTF-8 4

This one has the kludge! So it's only happening in FIDOTEST?
But this one has no PID:, should it?

 TK> * Forwarded from FIDOTEST by Tommi Koivula (2:221/6.600).
 TK> * Originally by: Tommi Koivula (2:221/6.600), 31 Dec 22 11:00.
 TK> * Originally to: Wilfred van Velzen.

 TK> On 31.12.2022 0:14, Wilfred van Velzen wrote:

 >> There is no TZUTC: kludge...

 TK> It seems that FMAIL is removing the kludge. I'm not joking. The kludge is
 TK> there in JAM base before 'fmail scan'.

 TK> A test message before scanning in Golded:

 TK> ===
 TK>  Subj : 123

 TK> @MSGID: 2:221/6.600 63aff95c
 TK> @PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20221231
 TK> @CHRS: UTF-8 4
 TK> @TZUTC: 0200
 TK> 123
 TK> ===

 TK> A test message after scanning in Golded:

 TK> ===
 TK>  Subj : 123

 TK> @MSGID: 2:221/6.600 63aff95c
 TK> @PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 1.3 20221231
 TK> @TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
 TK> @CHRS: UTF-8 4
 TK> 123
 TK> ===

That is highly surprising! Are you sure nothing else touches it?
It never happens on my own system, so I can't debug what doesn't reproduce. But can you send me the piece of FMail log where this
happens?

Did you compile FMail yourself? Or did you use one of the precompiled ones?

Can you experiment with the 'Tearline' option. There is a setting that doesn't add the TID kludge.

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.19-B20221229