Hello andrew.

10 Nov 02 20:19, you wrote to me:

 ac> {at}MSGID: 3:633/267{at}fidonet 3dcec059
 ac> {at}TZUTC: 1100
 ac> {at}REPLY: 3:640/954{at}fidonet 3dce1f21
 ac> {at}TID: hpt 1.3.0/w32 17-10-02
 ac> Sun 2002-11-10 18:52, Rick Van Ruth (3:640/954) wrote to andrew clarke:


 >> The same reason the TID is moved - the echomail is altered at either
 >> 1:106/1 or 1:379/1

 ac> Well, I would've thought so, except I've seen my own messages that I
 ac> sent via
 ac> 3:633/285 being sent back to me via 1:379/1 (*) and they seem OK, ie.
 ac> TID in the right place.  Very unusual!  I suspect the two MSGID problem
 ac> is unrelated though.  But who knows.

Prior to changing your link you weren't seeing this thing happen though. You
also don't see it in echomail that travels a different route.

 >> You can check by locating the TID in this response - if its been
 >> altered and is now down the bottom of the message then its due to
 >> this echomail passing via 1:106/1 1:379/1 and being altered at one
 >> of those systems.

 >> --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5 - Debian/GNU
 >> {at}TID: MBSE-FIDO 0.35.05
 >> {at}PATH: 640/954 774/605 123/500 106/1 379/1

 ac> Yes.  But now check mine.  I don't understand why mail would be altered
 ac> one way but not the other!

Yours is fine (at top of this reply).

 ac> Maybe it's a packet sorter doing it (do people still use packet
 ac> sorters when CPU/HDD speed is cheap?).

I have no idea, but there is something running on one of those systems
besides just Squish I would think, and its picking up some messages and
changing them for some reason.

Cheers,
                Rick

... Hard work never killed anyone but why take a risk?
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5 - Debian/GNU
@TID: MBSE-FIDO 0.35.05