Similar to the Malmstrom AFB UFO events we just examined, the
Big Sur UFO event, if it is true, seems to likewise send the
message that the occupants of UFO's, whoever they are, don't
like the people of Earth creating nuclear weapons; and they
are determined to stop us from doing so; even by force if
necessary.

As with other UFO incidents we've been discussing, there is
controversy surrounding the Big Sur UFO event. A number of
UFO skeptics have suggested that the photographic equipment
that was available over forty years ago, was not capable of
producing the kind of results described by Jacobs. This is
because the UFO incident occurred about sixty miles above
the Earth, and Jacob's photographic team was located at Big
Sur, or about one hundred and twenty miles to the northwest
of Vandenberg AFB, (the launch site), in order to be able to
film a side view of the launch. Professor Jacobs refutes the
arguments of the skeptics; and in an analysis he published
in the January 1989 edition of the MUFON UFO Journal, called
"Deliberate Deception: The Big Sur UFO Filming", he explains
why it was indeed possible to make a film of the alleged UFO.
If you would like to read this rather detailed commentary,
you may still be able to find it at nicap.org/bigsur2.htm.
Following is Professor Jacobs' own description of the UFO
encounter, taken from his MUFON analysis:

----- Begin Quote -----

"At that point the most remarkable vision of my life came on
the screen. Another object flew into the frame from left to
right. It approached the warhead package and maneuvered
around it. That is, this . . . "thing" . . . flew a relative
polar orbit around our warhead package which was itself
heading toward the South Pacific at some 18 thousand miles
an hour!

As the new object circumnavigated our hardware, it emitted
four distinct bright flashes of light at approximately the 4
cardinal compass points of its orbit. These flashes were so
intense that each "strike" caused the I.O. tube to "boom" or
form a halo around the spot. Following this remarkable aerial
display, the object departed the frame in the same direction
from which it had come. The shape of the object was that of
a classic "flying saucer." In the middle of the top half of
the object was a dome. From that dome, or just beneath it,
seemed to issue a beam of light which caused the flashes
described.

Subsequently, the warhead malfunctioned and tumbled out of
suborbit, hundreds of miles short of its target. This . . .
unidentified flying . . . "thing" had apparently "shot down"
an American dummy atomic warhead!"

----- End Quote -----

So once again we ask the same question: Was the UFO tale just
a cover-up story that was used by the military to protect a
top secret government Atlas missile experiment; or was there
really a UFO involved in the launch, and the U.S. Government
is just following its normal modus operandi, by denying it?
For his part, Professor Jacobs is convinced that what they
captured on film that day, was a real UFO, piloted by alien
beings from another world. As we saw earlier, Jacobs remains
convinced that these extraterrestrial beings are trying to
send a clear message to us, that we should not be tampering
with nuclear weapons. In summarizing his conclusions, Prof.
Jacobs states in the same analysis:

----- Begin Quote -----

(1) What we photographed that September day in 1964 was a
solid, three-dimensional, intelligently controlled flying
device.

(2) It emitted a beam of energy, possibly a plasma beam, at
our dummy warhead and caused a malfunction.

(3) This "craft" was not anything of which our science and
technology in 1964 was capable. The most probable explanation
of the device, therefore, is that it was of extraterrestrial
origin.

(4) The flashing strikes of light we recorded on film were
not from laser tracking devices. Such devices did not exist
then, aside from small scale, laboratory models.

(5) Most probably, the B.U. Telescope was brought out to
California specifically to photograph this event which had
been prearranged. That is, we had been setup to record an
event which someone in our Government knew was going to
happen in advance.

(6) What we photographed that day was the first terrestrial
demonstration of what has come to be called S.D.I. or "Star
Wars." The demonstration was put on for our benefit for some
reason by extraterrestrials. It is this aspect of the event,
not merely the recording of another "flying Saucer", which
caused such consternation both on the part of Major Mansmann
when he told me "it never happened", and on behalf of the
government in its two and one half decade coverup of the
event and the record we made of it.

----- End Quote -----

What adds to the Big Sur UFO debate, is the fact that both
Mansmann and Jacobs insist that on the day that Jacobs was
called into his office to view the film, two or three agents
from the CIA were present as well. After Jacobs was warned
to keep quiet regarding the UFO incident, the CIA agents,
along with the film, disappeared, and the film has not been
seen again. Furthermore, all inquiries via FOIA requests, to
Vandenberg Air Force Base, regarding the September 15, 1964
UFO event, have resulted in the base insisting that no Atlas
F missile tests were conducted on that particular day. In
fact, Vandenberg AFB officials have stated that they are not
even in possession of any records concerning the alleged UFO
incident.

Let us now turn our attention to Ross Dedrickson, a retired
U.S. Air Force colonel, who during the 1950's, worked with
the Atomic Energy Commission. As Colonel Dedrickson shared
in his testimony to The Disclosure Project, his very first
encounter with UFO's occurred during the famous Washington,
D.C. fly-over in July of 1952. Part of Col. Dedrickson's job
responsibilities at that time included maintaining the AEC's
inventory of its nuclear weapons stockpile. This included
accompanying the security teams as they visited the various
nuclear installations, in order to verify the security of
said weapons. In his testimony, Colonel Dedrickson stated in
part:

----- Begin Quote -----

" . . . we were getting reports of visits by UFO's over the
storage facilities, and even some of the manufacturing
facilities; and that went on continuously . . . through the
entire 50's . . . During this period of time, I also learned
of a number of incidents which happened involving UFOs . . .
I also learned about incidents involving nuclear weapons;
and among these incidents were those where a couple of
nuclear weapons that were sent into space, were destroyed by
the extraterrestrials . . . [Over-flights of nuclear
facilities] were taken so seriously that the observers would
often not report them, because it involved so much
bureaucracy and protocol . . . They deliberately would not
report them. On most of those cases where the UFO's became
identified, at least on a radar or with reports, why, they
would try to scramble aircraft to intercept them. It was a
very aggressive, you might say, response from our own
government . . . There was one incident when we exploded a
nuclear weapon over the Pacific, and this was in about '61,
I believe. The consternation that it caused [from the ETs]
was because it shut out communications over the Pacific
basin for a number of hours, in which no radio transmission
was available at any time . . . This was one that the
extraterrestrials were really concerned about, because it
affected our ionosphere. In fact, the ET spacecraft were
unable to operate because of the pollution in the magnetic
field which they depended upon . . . In either the very end
of the 70's or the early 80's . . . we attempted to put a
nuclear weapon on the Moon, and explode it for scientific
measurements and other things, which was not acceptable to
the extraterrestrials . . . The ETs destroyed the weapon as
it went toward the Moon. The idea of any explosion of a
nuclear weapon in space by any Earth government was not
acceptable to the extraterrestrials, and that has been
demonstrated over and over . . . Later, on our visits to Los
Alamos and Livermore, we found that people were interested
in the extraterrestrial technology, very much so . . . That
was the time when Area 51 became notorious."

----- End Quote -----

So what are we to make of all of these UFO testimonies by
U.S. military officials? Are the similarities between their
stories merely coincidence? Are they just liars or attention
seekers? Are they just performing their "patriotic duty" by
inventing stories in order to conceal the U.S. Government's
military secrets? Or is it possible that they are telling us
the truth, in spite of known risks to themselves and their
families? What do you think?

If you would like to learn more about the work and mission
of The Disclosure Project, I encourage you to visit their
website at disclosureproject.org. Study their material, and
then make your own determinations regarding whether or not
they are telling the truth.



Jeff Snyder, SysOp - Armageddon BBS  Visit us at endtimeprophecy.org port 23
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your Download Center 4 Mac BBS Software & Christian Files.  We Use Hermes II


--- Hermes Web Tosser 1.1