RS> C>> No, you are just too duplicitous to be honest. And, if you look
RS> C>> at your own answer...that is STILL not death due to science. It
RS> C>> is death due to politics. The science is not junk. While no
RS> C>> due to humans have died ddt, the environment has been seriously
RS> C>> harmed and if use had continued, there very well would have been
RS> C>> human deaths. Especially those of infants. DDT had been linked
RS> C>> to low birth weights and some other defects.

RS> JB> The science is in the fact that the original studies showed that
RS> JB> DDT was bad.  Leftists latched onto that and got it banned.
RS> JB> later the evidence showed that the DDT studies were done with
RS> JB> levels of DDT that were impossible to obtain under any method of
RS> JB> usage.  I see you are parroting your own beliefs above.

RS>And once again you parroted the Limbaugh talking point, despite it
RS>having been debunked.

No debunking occurred.  The evidence of the deaths while DDT was being 
used vs afterwards is well documented.  Likewise is the faulty testing 
methods to claim DDT was so unsafe.  You brought Limbaugh into this 
discussion (why, I have no idea), not me.  It appears, the you, like 
Obama, have studied at the Sol Ilinski school of radicalism.  


RS>And blame your strawman, "the Leftists."

They are the ones who bought into the junk science and caused the deaths 
of so many.  Similar story to the MTBE junk science in the early 90s 
that almost destroyed the water supply in the US.  


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999 
Progressive taxation is economic slavery for those who succeed .....


--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10