Well said.


.
"Joe Bridgehouse"  wrote in message
news:a8mv8a$i0m$1@helle.btinternet.com...
> I know sod all about American law and whether this woman broke any. But
she
> did demonstrate a perfect example of a hypocritical bitch.
> "RedFish"  wrote in message
> news:qbsr8.9356$nK3.2651192559@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
> > to reiterate.......
> >
> > --
> > "RedFish"  wrote in message
> > news:FXvn8.71039$2u5.98629796@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> > > Sarah Brady took her grief for her husband and translated that into
> > > something evil.  Something *SHE believed should be pressed onto every
> > other
> > > American citizen simply because *She thought it should be.  She
> determined
> > > that SHE was right and everyone else was wrong.
> > > And from that initiated steps to take away the Constitutional rights
of
> > > everyone.
> > >
> > > Break a *gun* law?  Perhaps not.....but she did break a multitude of
> other
> > > *laws.
> > > Just as Hitler and Hussein structured societies to suit *their beliefs
> and
> > > ideas.....Brady is no less guilty.
> > > Just as a thief will steal money in cases where they *believe it is
owed
> > > them because of what society has "done to them"; Sarah Brady has
stolen
> > > ethics, morals, safety and lives from millions and millions of
innocent
> > > citizens because she felt she was "owed" something as well.
> > >
> > > She should be imprisoned no more or less than the man who shot her
> > > husband....because in effect, she took the very *same weapon that the
> > > shooter had and attempted to kill everyone else with it.
> > >
> > > Thank God common sense prevailed in the end....but that makes her no
> less
> > > the guilty.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Randy RedFish
> > > .
> > >
> > > .
> > > "Joan Hampton"  wrote in message
> > > news:778fa5cb.0203241751.52956de3@posting.google.com...
> > > > Sarah Brady did NOT break any gun laws - she didn't even come close.
> > > > The New York Daily News published a retraction on Saturday totally
> > > > taking the blame for their mistake.  Here's what they said:
> > > >
> > > > CORRECTION
> > > >
> > > > A story in some early editions of yesterday's Daily News incorrectly
> > > > reported that gun-control advocate Sarah Brady may have skirted
> > > > Delaware's gun laws when she bought a rifle for her adult son but
did
> > > > not declare who was going to own the weapon.
> > > >
> > > > The Delaware Department of Justice initially insisted to The News
that
> > > > gun purchasers must declare who the weapon was intended for so that
> > > > person's background could be checked. Yesterday, a spokeswoman for
the
> > > > Delaware Department of Justice said it misinterpreted the law and
that
> > > > Brady was not obligated to state that the gun was for her son as
long
> > > > as he was legally qualified to own a firearm. In addition, a
spokesman
> > > > for Brady said, "Sarah Brady told the gun store that the gun was for
> > > > her son and filled out the forms that they asked her to fill out."
> > > >
> > > > The News regrets the error.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>