Rick Svyzek wrote in a message to Mike Bilow:
 RS> °§ Not much, now that I think about it.  NT can provide some
 RS> additional servic °§ such as domain controlled
 RS> authentication, but file and print sharing are pr °§ much
 RS> still file and print sharing.  Obviously, NT would have
 RS> higher capacit °§ and better reliability, but you cannot see
 RS> any of that from looking strictl °§ the network wire.
 RS> °§ 
 RS> °§ What are you really trying to find out?
 RS>   Right now I run a BBS in W4Wg and it's running reliability
 RS> as a  network system and multi tasker.  I come across a set
 RS> of NEC CD-ROMs with windows NT v3.1 and the second CD is
 RS> full of utilitys for the first CD.  I was seeing if it would
 RS> be better to switch over when I add more SCSI drives to my
 RS> network.  I don't have any books with these CDs. 
If you use NT, don't even consider using 3.1 -- it was a disaster.
If the BBS is DOS software, you might consider using OS/2 Warp.
If things are working now under WfWG, why change?
 
-- Mike
P.S.  Moderator Hat On: Please don't use those funny non-ASCII characters 
when framing quoted portions of the message.  They will map strangely for 
readers who have non-English code pages active, and could greatly annoy 
readers who are not using IBM PC compatible systems at all.
--- 
---------------