On 21/11/2019 03:41, Lee Lofaso -> David Drummond wrote:

 DD>> Yes, there is that. But other than the Fidonews submission address, what
 DD>> have the Romans ever given us ... er, what else in Policy *NEEDS* to be
 DD>> changed?

 LL> A few other things, namely the "loyalty oath".

Oh? Which para is that?

 DD>> Please note, I am not a worshipping devotee of Policy 4.anything, I see
it
 DD>> as merely a guidance document.

 LL> Since the document itself is void, Oli is correct - "P4 is crap."

Crap - as shown by ... Oli's opinion?

 LL> If you and others want to use that informal piece of "crap" as
 LL> a "guidance document" nobody will stop you.  But I would not recommend
 LL> anybody try to wipe their a$$ with it.  Unless they like gooey hands.

And as such you are unlikely to get a node number.

How is that coming along BTW?

-- 

Regards
David

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0