On 19/11/2019 14:34, Dan Clough -> Terry Roati wrote:

 TR>> I don't disagree, all I am saying is I would consider any good
 TR>> sensible workable advice, and not consider it because it came
 TR>> from a non memeber.

 DC> I see your point too, and agree that it's stupid to not at least
 DC> consider all input regardless of source.  But....  there comes a
 DC> point where you have to have limits, or else.... you don't really
 DC> have an organization any more, or at least any (internal) control
 DC> over said organization.  I think requiring any actual proposals
 DC> come from "members in good standing" is not unusual or beyond what
 DC> a reasonable person should require.

Besides Oli hasn't made any constructive criticism, all he's suggested is that
"Policy is crap".

So far no-one has stated what is "crap" about Policy (well, other than the
Fidonews submission address, and the viaducts, and the roads, and the schools,
and the health services, ...)

-- 

Regards
David

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0