From: "Bill Mattox" 

However, being a Clinton despiser is not at odds here. They represent the
antithesis of freedom that goes beyond just political/personal differences
and moves into the criminal, which is not uncommon for left-leaning
political mindsets throughout the world. For those with an inclination
toward heavy-handed government control, the end invariably winds up
justifying the means, with all the ugly ramifications seen throughout the
ages.

Thus, the Clinton administration -- by nature -- inevitably winds up on the
opposite end of the freedom spectrum on almost every particular issue --
including the Elian issue, which is rich in its symbolism regarding where
they would have us, as a Nation, go.

I would say, in fact, that these people are not only dispicable, they are dangerous.

"Randall Parker"  wrote in message
news:MPG.137f973d28a7707f98a2c1{at}news.barkto.com...
> In , note these cogitations
> from blucy{at}mediaone.net Bill Lucy:
> > I don't believe you fall into the second group, but there are at least
two
> > people involved in the thread who are.
>
> My views about freedom come from a strong affinity for the ideas of Ayn
> Rand about rational man. Note the thread title I just started about
> freedom. Its time we got to the bottom of some of the differences in
> views posted here. I think the idea of just what is meant by "freedom"
> is really at the root of them.
>
> (and I'm prepared to skewer certain definitions of freedom )
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5