On Nov 10, 9:16=A0am, "Nicole Massey"  wrote:
>
> Since you shut down such responses from the moderators, you are assuming
> that you were censored instead of knowing it for sure, as you have no
> evidence either way if it was moderation or not. In light of constant
> problems getting things to this newsgroup, it's more logical to assume th=
at
> it wasn't direct moderation, and instead was the result of some other
> problem. I understand there is emotional value in assuming that it's enem=
y
> action, but that is an assumption.

I have very good intuition generally speaking. The Presidential
election turned out exactly as I feared it would in fact.

But I take your point.
--- SBBSecho 2.20-Win32