"Terry Roati -> Oli"  wrote:

 O>> Why should I get a node number in R24 when I already have
 O>> uplinks in R28 and Z3? Just because Fidonet used POTS in a time
 O>> that is not "relevant" anymore and it still can get over it?

[...]

 TR> I beleive you already know the above very well so if you want to
 TR> change things then go ahead and list your suggestions and how they
 TR> can be implemented.

 TR> Saying something is outdated doesn't help even if it's true.

Are you trolling me? ;)

I was not the one who suggested I should get a node number. You already know
that I think the P4 is crap and my proposal is to get rid of it. If you don't
want to get rid of P4 there are obviously only two options for that specific
issue: rewrite the P4 (start with 1.3.2) or ignore (parts of) the P4.

---