From: "conANDave" 
Subject: Re: What's wrong with Voyager
Date: 2000/07/08
Message-ID: #1/1
References:    
Organization: @Home Network
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 22:15:38 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.tv.star-trek.voyager,fido.trek

"King of Cyberia"  wrote in message
news:Pine.GSO.4.21.0007060007001.16541-100000@uhunix4...
:On Jul 5 conANDave walked on stage, wiggled said hiney and
:spoke to the members of alt.tv.star-trek.voyager:
:
:c :> not weaker than TNG, which I think seems very
:c :> dated now and hasnt worn well at all.
:
:Erm... Next Generation, DATED???

You better realize I didn't say that.  That was Lisa, the girl I responded
to.

:cd :TNG had actual and undeniable talent in front and, for the most part,
:cd :behind the scenes.  (This includes Wil Wheaton, who I feel really
:cd :sorry for, because he is a really good actor.  TNG destroyed his
:cd :career.)  Sure TNG had it's bad writing (who could forget the creation
:cd :of Wesley Crusher?), but it was a gold standard.  TNG holds almost all
:cd :of "modern Trek's" gems, from "Inner Light" to "Best of Both Worlds".
:
:I'm not sure that TNG "destroyed" Wheaton's career. Can you name a source?

Do you need a source?  I haven't seen him in very many "spotlight" acting
jobs since his stint on TNG ended.  Well... I suppose two appearances on the
new "Love Boat" mean something... :-P

:cd :Outside a few computer effect flukes (like those green computer
:cd :monitors back in Season 1), TNG has worn very well, due to it's
:
:Really?? Which eps?

Can't cite episodes.  But, I do know for a fact that in a few Season One
episodes, the rear monitors on the bridge were in green for some Computer
effects.