RM> The benefit to the living is obvious, I agree wholeheartedly.

 RM> But asking me for her organs 10 seconds after she dies?



 RS> The problem is often that they choose to use life support on a kid

 RS> thats clinically dead, to improve the usefulness of the donated organs

 RS> too. That can produce more than a tad of severe brain fade in the

 RS> parents at times too. Coz it looks like it aint actually dead at all.



I don't think I'd have a problem there. The reason I'm uncertain is

that I've never been that close to a sudden death, and I don't know

how nutty it would make me.



 RM> It's easy to discuss coldly when we're not involved,



 RS> And plenty can do it even when they are too.



And plenty can't. Poor argument.



 RM> I offer as evidence your uncharacteristic lack

 RM> of response to my recent abortion of a poem.



 RS> Thats what caused his heart attack you fool. Its YOUR fault.



Cool! Does this mean I could have a career as a remote assassin?





 RM> er.. are you sure you have your arguments straight?

 RM> If you allow immediate automatic resumation of

 RM> organs on death, why waste all that meat as well?



 RS> You arent allowed eat your dog either.



I thought the law applied to what food I offer other people. What I

eat (short of human flesh and restricted drugs) is my own business.



--- PPoint 1.88