KW>> Could you enlighten me?

 LL> There is nothing to be found in P4, since there is nothing there.
 LL> Not that it matters, since P4 is void (invalid from the get-go).

Yet that is the document followed by most nodelist clerks. When you apply to
THEIR system for access THEIR rules apply.

Like it or lump it, your choice if you want to be node listed.

{...]

 LL> The phrase David D. used is "If you do not fulfill the conditions
 LL> the NC you apply to expects then you will not get a node number assigns,
 LL> nor included in the nodelist."

 LL> Since the terms of the agreement (P4) are impossible to fulfill
 LL> or too vague to understand, that makes the agreement (P4) voidable
 LL> in and of itself.

How is it that about 1000 of us around today have managed to understand Pol4
and succeed with our node number applications?

 LL> Either way you look at it, P4 is cyberjunk.

Yet that is what most nodelist clerks rely on. IT WORKS!

 LL> Since P4 is unreliable, at best, to serve as a guideline as to
 LL> sending a "properly formed request" to obtain a node number, and
 LL> no NC seems to have a clue, how does one go about finding out
 LL> how to obtain a node number?

Bullshit. How many NCs have you actually asked?

The steps laid out in Pol4 are simple to understand and DO work.

Are you actually interested in getting a node number/nodelisted, or do you just
like hearing your own voice?

-- 

Regards
David

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0