GJO> RT> FA> Every heard of statistical probabilities....
GJO> RT> If we are to use statistical probabilities we must admit that out of
> RT> the literally millions of UFO sightings, thousands of encounters of
> RT> various kinds, and alien visitations over the eons that have been
> RT> reported, at least ONE piece of tangible alien evidence would have
> RT> been found, preserved and made public. No government is big enough,
> RT> smart enough, and quick enough to suppress it all that well this
> RT> long.
[snip]
>The public deep down does not really give a damn....
Agreed.
>second point is that a large percentage of these million of sightings are
>most likely natural phenomena....
But its the _volume_ of sightings that make up the numbers that UFO
believers depend on for their "law of statistics" (They all can't be
wrong.. remember?). Why are believers allowed to use these statistics
when skeptics aren't?
---
þ QMPro 1.02 42-7029 þ ¯ìûÔÔh·¤ ŽCþhanks for hanging up, dear.
---------------
* Origin: Crime Bytes 2 - Underwood, Iowa (712)566-2872 (1:285/12)
|