ML>
ML> ML> First sentence of II/1. "The Executive power shall be vested in
ML> ML> a  President of the United States of America."
ML>
ML> NP> I don't think this sentence gives rise to some nebuluous
ML> NP> executive  order power, which is what we have now.
ML>
ML>   Without it, how can the president execute the executive power
ML>vested in  him by the constitution?.
Look at those Constitutionally defined powers of the President.  He does
not need executive orders as we now call them.  And his powers very
clearly do not empower him to give _any_ orders over the citizens of the
nation, or the congress for that matter.
---
* CMPQwk #1.4* UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
--- InterEcho 1.18
---------------