Once Upon A Time,
SLerman wrote:

>On Jul 21, 6:38=A0pm, Amy Guskin  wrote:
>> I daresay that there are some subjects for which it is
>> _very_ useful, but if a topic is even the slightest bit controversial,
>> there's nothing to stop it from being edited, and edited, and edited, =
with
>> any old information that someone wants to post.
>>
>> Amy
>> --
>> "In my line of work you gotta keep repeating things over and over and =
over
>> again for the truth to sink in, to kinda catapult the propaganda." - G=
eorge
>> W. Bush, May 24, 2005
>
>Bullseye. Wikipedia is generally very good for straight facts,
>especially in sciences, but anything beyond facts should always be
>considered critically.

Facts, bah!  Facts are meaningless.  You can use facts to prove anything
that's even *remotely* true!  That's just waaaay too slippery for me!


**=20
Captain Infinity
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32