RM> Are you agreeing or disagreeing with me here? It's a bit hard to tell.



 RS> I'm saying that your line at the top about the potential for abuse is

 RS> a complete dud, coz that potential is there already with the other than

 RS> euthanasia and has always been there. There is ALWAYS potential for abuse.



 RS> So thats not a good enough reason to not allow euthanasia.



Ok, I'll buy that.





 RS> You just cant get past the very fundamental point that

 RS> we continue to do to humans what you can and do get charged

 RS> for doing if its your dog in that particular situation.



 RM> About the only thing I can think of that I could legally

 RM> do to a human that I can't legally do to a dog is screw it.



 RS> You are allowed to let the human suffer obscenely.

 RS> You would be charged if you did that to a dog.



Ah. Good line - may I borrow it?



Cheers



--- PPoint 1.88