| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Alleged hijacking |
Re: Re: Alleged hijacking By: Earl Croasmun to Wilfred Van Velzen on Wed Jun 15 2016 16:38:46 EC> "while a biased list keeper would intervene and make case-by-case EC> decisions (or EC> give in to special-pleading requests to make case-by-case decisions) on EC> which listings to permit." >> That's what happend... EC> Doesn't look that way. Hypothetically, if someone wanted to create an EC> actual, functioning echo in which to have open discussions over the value EC> of the listing process, I would guess that would probably fly. The same EC> thing happened EC> in another instance where it was determined that "The echo is a legitimate EC> one in use by private users." When somebody lists an echo that is in use in a different zone, and manages to get it accepted by the list keeper, over the objections of the moderator of that echo, then I think it is wrong. --- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32* Origin: The Lions Den BBS, Trenton, On, CDN (1:249/303) SEEN-BY: 123/500 633/0 267 280 281 408 812 @PATH: 249/303 203/0 320/119 123/500 633/280 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.