| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | UK Public `Favour` Smart ID Cards |
(Well, 81% of 450 trial participants, anyway)
Public 'favour' smart ID cards
By Steve Ranger [18-12-2002]
Home Office claims success with biometric trials
Four out of five members of the public are in favour of a biometric
identity card, according to the Home Office, but critics have warned
that the cards will face security problems and will be hard to
implement.
The Home Office is conducting trials of smart cards with the
UK Passport Service using iris scanning.
It claimed that 81 per cent of 450 trialists were in favour of
its use, and 64 per cent were in favour of a scheme where everyone
needed a card to access government services.
The Home Office added that 45 per cent of trialists had only positive
things to say about the cards, and that most concerns were based
around security.
Speaking at a Privacy International conference, Home Office minister
Lord Falconer insisted that the cards could cut fraud, tackle illegal
working and immigration and improve access to government services.
The Home Office is considering a central database alongside the cards,
to hold details such as name, address, date and place of birth and
gender. This is designed to cut duplication and errors across
government.
But other data would be held by departments in separate databases.
"There would not be one government database that contained all
information on the population held by all departments," said Lord
Falconer.
He explained that facial recognition, fingerprints and iris scans
are all being considered as potential identification methods, but
admitted that no system would be completely secure.
"There is no such thing as absolute security," said Lord Falconer.
"We recognise that there are risks, but if you don't have these
databases you have worse problems."
However, Dr Ross Anderson, of the Computing Laboratory at Cambridge
University, warned: "Biometrics are not as infallible as people think,
and smart cards are easier to forge than you might think."
He added that there is also a danger in giving control over the project
to any one organisation. "The company that gets the franchise will have
the UK over a barrel," he said.
And Peter Lilley MP, former Conservative Secretary of State for Social
Security, who introduced the ill-fated Pathway benefits card which cost
the government [UK Pounds] 700m before being abandoned, warned that
there could be a similar fate ahead for the entitlement cards.
"If the government cannot get a benefits payment card to work for
benefits recipients, how can it get a card to work for 60 million
people, a proportion of whom will not be happy to have it?" he asked.
The Home Office consultation runs until 31 January.
-==-
Source: VNU Net News - http://www.vnunetnews.com/News/1137657
Cheers, Steve..
---
* Origin: This man is a dentist, so we can't show you his face (3:800/432)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 800/7 1 640/954 774/605 123/500 106/1 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.