Re: Re: Alleged hijacking
  By: Ben Ritchey to Joe Delahaye on Sun Jun 12 2016 19:05:46

 JD>> I dont read the echo, but you must keep in mind that just because an
 JD>> echo is not in y our list, does not mean that it has expired.  There

 BR> Technically maybe not, but just because an echo "exists"
somewhere is of
 BR> no concern to the list, until it gets listed, then the users decide!

 JD>> are many echos, not listed, and doing quite well.  That is something
 JD>> else to keep in mind.

 BR> Doesn't matter, but by the same token just because someone picks up an
 BR> echo on the echolist as 'moderator' doesn't make him
"moderator", the
 BR> users do. BUT a budding moderator can earn his stripes by his actions ...
 BR> AND revive a dead echo in some cases. So there's always hope :)

Perhaps. but in that case maybe the moderator should be listed as TBA
--- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32