| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | I`m Back!!! (farewell, A |
On (04 Jan 04) Bob Lawrence wrote to Roy Mcneill... RM> a nearby lightning strike knocked out our power for a while RM> (according to our neighbour, we were all out). The cables to RM> the sprinkler solenoids must have acted as antennae BL> Ha, ha! Told you so! RM> or maybe our 240V earth was sufficiently different from the RM> sprinkler controller earth, because when I got home both of the RM> serial ports on my pooter were dead, and the RS232 signal from RM> Drip (the sprinkler controller) was iffy. I replaced the RM> MC1488/1489 RS232 chips in Drip, but the com ports on the RM> pooter were still dead. BL> How long is it since you built DRIP? It must be five years! And I BL> told you so! Nine years, at least. That's the oldest file I can find. BL> As I said then... a good way to isolate long antenna leads from BL> microchips is an ordinary resistor (they're all spiral cut nowadays) BL> with a physically small capacitor to ground at the micro end. What BL> value resistor and capacitor depends on the speed of DRIP (or BL> whatever), and the slower the better. Ideally I used 10K and 2.2uF BL> electro, but on a telephone dialler I dropped that to 2.2K and 0.1uF. BL> Little electros are really good at absorbing sparks. The blue 0.1uF BL> only last for ten sparks or so. The serial interface runs at 2400 baud. I think I'd prefer a series resistor and a pair of back-to-back shunt [zener-in-series-with-a- diode]'s to local ground. This should bother the serial data a bit less. BL> It's important to establish a GROUND on the printed board, so that BL> if "EARTH" jumps up as you suspect, then the micro and the isolating BL> capacitors also jump up. You have to watch any other connections you BL> make to ground. During a lightning strike there is *NO* ground. It all BL> jumps up in the air by ten of thousands of volts and there is no BL> way to prevent it... you have to make sure there is an isolating BL> resistor to limit the energy that flows into the micro, and a BL> capacitor to tie the micro grounds together. Yes. I'm familiar with lightning protection in radio huts on mountain tops. Step 1 is to install a good ground just outside the hut. After that, connect that ground to a metal plate that all the coax cables pass through (through lightning protection modules that absorb high voltages on the coax inner conductors). Then, inside the building, connect that metal plate to the mounting racks of the radios, and to the 240V electrical ground. Outside the building, install a ground at the foot of the antenna tower (sometimes the tower foundations will be adequate, but not always) and connect the coax shields to this earth as they leave the tower to go to the hut. Make sure that the highest point of the antenna tower assembly is the tower itself, and not an antenna. Protection for Drip would be similar. At the Drip end, series resistors and bidirectional zeners to Drip's local ground. At the PC end, ditto, although defining the "local ground" could be fun - I think I'd use the pc's grounded metal case, rather than the "common" connection in the RS232 cable. BL> I've never actually done it with a computer box, but it you just BL> wired the capacitors on the back and let the resistors hang out it BL> should be okay. RM> A couple of days later, Win98 failed, and would only start in RM> Safe mode. WinXP would only get as far as its 1st advertisement RM> page. I took the pooter to a surgery, and it got a motherboard RM> transplant. BL> Yair... that's the problem. Once the spark getsinto the board, there BL> is no way to know where it will end up. You need the resistor to limit BL> the energy (it actually sparks over inside), and a capacitor to absorb BL> the sharp edges of the spark. Even 2.2K and no capacitor makes a huge BL> difference. RM> Now its video system is different, and the monitor doesn't want RM> to know about Win98 screen resolutions greater than 800x600 - RM> it comes up with a little message that says "Attention: RM> 67K/74Hz is out of range" (or 68K/84Hz, 64K/59Hz, etc) XP runs RM> ok at 1024x768, but no higher. So now I'll need a new monitor RM> as well. Drat. BL> That *really* sucks! Every motherboard comes with its own video, and BL> none of then run the old monitor. Have you tried reinstalling the BL> video drivers that came with the old board? The monitors are usually BL> standard... Turns out the new video drivers had an "enhanced" option that was turned on by default. Turning it off fixed the problem. Cheers --- PPoint 1.88* Origin: Silicon Heaven (3:712/610.16) SEEN-BY: 633/104 260 262 267 270 285 640/296 305 384 531 954 1042 690/734 SEEN-BY: 712/610 848 774/605 800/221 445 @PATH: 712/610 640/531 954 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.